Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Hydrogen bomb essays

Hydrogen bomb essays On August 6, 1945 the atomic bomb was dropped on Japan and the world stood back horrified at the destructive force that man had created with nature and technology. Tens of thousands of people were killed, most of which by terrible burns and radiation poisoning. Everyone thought that the ultimate military weapon had been discover short of the wrath of god, but they were wrong. In 1952 the first Hydrogen bomb was tested in Enewetok. Enewetok is an island that was originally given to Japan by the League of Nations. It was later captured during World War II and designated as a nuclear test site. Of course before the testing began the islands inhabitants were evacuated. It was later deemed safe to come back there and resume life in 1980. The bomb which was nicknamed "Mike" had a mushroom cloud eight miles across and twenty seven miles tall and the canopy was 100 miles across. It made a crater two hundred feet deep and six thousand five hundred feet across. Eighty million tons of Earth was vaporized. In comparison the atomic bomb to the hydrogen bomb is a match to a stick of dynamite. In 1953 the USSR (or Russia now a days) detonated a hydrogen bomb of their own. Later Great Britain, France, and China tested hydrogen bombs of their own. This created a sort of "nuclear club-nations". The requirements for this so-called "club" is that you must have nuclear capabilities and willingly admitting to stockpiling these bombs. The way that this bomb works is very complicated. But the bang for the buck you get out of one of these things is literally going to stop your enemy "dead" in his tracks. The reaction starts with fusion of the hydrogen isotopes. An isotope is one of two or more atoms having the same atomic number but differing in atomic weight and mass number. This fusion creates heavier elements because of the number of lighter elements joined together. This difference in mass creates energy. This is called an en ...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Normans - Medieval Viking Rulers in France and England

Normans - Medieval Viking Rulers in France and England The Normans (from the Latin Normanni and Old Norse for north men) were ethnic Scandinavian Vikings who settled in northwest France in the early 9th century AD. They controlled the region known as Normandy until the mid 13th century. In 1066, the most famous of the Normans, William the Conqueror, invaded England and conquered the resident Anglo-Saxons; after William, several kings of England including Henry I and II and Richard the Lionheart were Normans and ruled both regions. Dukes of Normandy Rollo the Walker 860-932, ruled Normandy 911-928, married Gisla (daughter of Charles the Simple)William Longsword  ruled 928-942Richard I (the Fearless), born 933, ruled 942-996 married Hugh the Greats daughter Emma, then GunnorRichard II (The Good) ruled 996-1026 married JudithRichard III ruled 1026-1027Robert I (The Magnificent, or The Devil) ruled 1027-1035 (Richard IIIs brother) William the Conquerer, 1027-1087, ruled 1035-1087, also King of England after 1066, married Matilda of Flanders Robert II (Curthose), ruled Normandy 1087-1106 Henry I (Beauclerc) b. 1068, King of England 1100-1135 Henry II b. 1133, ruled England 1154-1189 Richard the Lionheart also King of England 1189-1216John Lackland Vikings in France By the 830s, the Vikings arrived from Denmark and began raiding in what is today France, finding the standing Carolingian government in the midst of an ongoing civil war. The Vikings were only one of several groups who found the weakness of the Carolingian empire an attractive target. The Vikings used the same tactics in France as they did in England: plundering the monasteries, markets and towns; imposing tribute or Danegeld on the people they conquered; and killing the bishops, disrupting ecclesiastical life and causing a sharp decline in literacy. The Vikings became permanent settlers with the express collusion of Frances rulers, although many of the grants were simply a recognition of de facto Viking control of the region. Temporary settlements were first established along the Mediterranean coast from a series of royal grants from Frisia to the Danish Vikings: the first was in 826, when Louis the Pious granted Harald Klak the county of Rustringen to use as a retreat. Subsequent rulers did the same, usually with the aim of putting one Viking in place to defend the Frisian coast against others. A Viking army first wintered on the Seine river in 851, and there joined forces with the kings enemies, the Bretons, and Pippin II. Founding Normandy: Rollo the Walker The duchy of Normandy was founded by Rollo (Hrolfr) the Walker, a Viking leader in the early 10th century. In 911, the Carolingian king Charles the Bald ceded land including the lower Seine valley to Rollo, in the Treaty of St Clair sur Epte. That land was extended to include what is today all of Normandy by AD 933 when the French King Ralph granted the land of the Bretons to Rollos son William Longsword. The Viking court based at Rouen was always a little shaky, but Rollo and his son William Longsword did their best to shore up the duchy by marrying into the Frankish elite. There were crises in the duchy in the 940s and 960s, particularly when William Longsword died in 942 when his son Richard I was only 9 or 10. There were fights among the Normans, particularly between pagan and Christian groups. Rouen continued as a subordinate to the Frankish kings until the Norman War of 960-966, when Richard I fought against Theobald the Trickster. Richard defeated Theobald, and newly arrived Vikings pillaged his lands. That was the moment when Normans and Normandy became a formidable political force in Europe. William the Conquerer The 7th Duke of Normandy was William, the son Robert I, succeeding to the ducal throne in 1035. William married a cousin, Matilda of Flanders, and to appease the church for doing that, he built two abbeys and a castle in Caen. By 1060, he was using that to build a new power base in Lower Normandy, and that is where he began amassing for the Norman Conquest of England. You can find lots more about William the Conquerer and the Battle of Hastings elsewhere. Ethnicity and the Normans Archaeological evidence for the Viking presence in France is notoriously slim. Their villages were basically fortified settlements, consisting of earthwork-protected sites called motte (en-ditched mound) and bailey (courtyard) castles, not that different from other such villages in France and England at that time. The reason for the lack of evidence for explicit Viking presence may be that the earliest Normans tried to fit into the existing Frankish powerbase. But that didnt work well, and it was not until 960 when Rollos grandson Richard I galvanized the notion of Norman ethnicity, in part to appeal to the new allies arriving from Scandinavia. But that ethnicity was largely limited to kinship structures and place names, not material culture, and by the end of the 10th century, the Vikings had largely assimilated into the larger European medieval culture. Historic Sources Most of what we know of the early Dukes of Normandy is from Dudo of St Quentin, a historian whose patrons were Richard I and II. He painted an apocalyptic picture of Normandy in his best-known work De moribus et actis primorum normanniae ducum, written between 994-1015. Dudos text was the basis for future Norman historians including William of Jumià ¨ges (Gesta Normannorum Ducum), William of Poitiers (Gesta Willelmi), Robert of Torigni and Orderic Vitalis. Other surviving texts include the Carmen de Hastingae Proelio and the  Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. Sources This article is part of the About.com guide to Vikings, and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology Cross KC. 2014. Enemy and Ancestor: Viking Identities and Ethnic Boundaries in England and Normandy, c.950 – c.1015. London: University College London. Harris I. 1994. Stephen of Rouens Draco Normannicus: A Norman Epic. Sydney Studies in Society and Culture 11:112-124. Hewitt CM. 2010. The Geographic Origins of the Norman Conquerors of England. Historical Geography 38(130-144). Jervis B. 2013. Objects and social change: A case study from Saxo-Norman Southampton. In: Alberti B, Jones AM, and Pollard J, editors. Archaeology After Interpretation: Returning Materials to Archaeological Theory. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press. McNair F. 2015. The politics of being Norman in the reign of Richard the Fearless, Duke of Normandy (r. 942–996). Early Medieval Europe 23(3):308-328. Peltzer J. 2004. Henry II and the Norman Bishops. The English Historical Review 119(484):1202-1229. Petts D. 2015. Churches and lordship in Western Normandy AD 800-1200. In: Shepland M, and Pardo JCS, editors. Churches and Social Power in Early Medieval Europe. Brepols: Turnhout.

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Self steem Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Self steem - Essay Example Lauren Slater in her article The Trouble with Self-Esteem tries to make a reply with examination of various scientists’ controversial views. It is relevant to say that there is no common and sole opinion concerning the correlation between self-esteem and felonies. Due to David Long in most cases terrorists and bandits keep a feeling of great dissatisfaction deep inside. Therefore, when culprits break a law, they attempt to compensate own worthlessness with a help of â€Å"significant† actions, so â€Å"the less confidence you have, the worse you do† (qtd. in Slater 44). In contrast to that point of view, Nicholas Emler believes that â€Å"there is absolutely no evidence that low self-esteem is particularly harmful† (qtd. in Slater 44). Moreover, there is an assumption that people with low self-esteem do much better in life and achieve more than people with high self-esteem. On the one part it really makes sense. A person with low self-esteem will always tr y harder, because of his own farfetched inability and weakness to do something properly. And person with high self-esteem will be more passive, falsely believing that everything is possible and achievable for him. But on the other hand these examples may be scrutinized differently.